to First Draft
« Today On Holden's Obsession With The Gaggle | Main | Bush Has One Joke »
New NBC/WSJ poll....
Finally your moment of zen....Timmeh Russert attempts to spell out (fonetikly) the reason for the 66% wrong track....
UPDATE: I see my video was picked up at Mediabistro UPDATE: I see they have replaced it with one of theirs today.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5ced53ef00d834a915f169e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference America hates Bush's war:
» Buy valium online. from Buy valium online.
Buy valium online. [Read More]
The comments to this entry are closed.
One of the first blog-based books, the anthology Special Plans examines Feith's role in misleading America into war. Buy from Amazon and William, James & Co.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Big Russ hangs his head in shame.
Posted by: attaturk | April 25, 2007 at 18:56
darn.
sigh. maybe next week pansypoo is OSX!
russert is an idiot. he ain't even pretty, how did he get there?!?
Posted by: pansypoo | April 25, 2007 at 21:05
Your pictures went away. Can you make Little Russ go away, too?
Posted by: Robert Earle | April 26, 2007 at 01:21
Well I fixed the pics. Sorry I can't fix Timmeh
Posted by: scout | April 26, 2007 at 02:10
Why is it "Democrats" vs. "President Bush"? Shouldn't it be "Democrats" vs. "Republicans"?
Don't let them run away from their great adventure.
Posted by: NYMary | April 26, 2007 at 07:57
While we're on things like spelling, shouldn't picture #2 read "Whom do you agree with?"
Posted by: Mike the Mad Biologist | April 26, 2007 at 08:28
Timmeh is correct and bilingual. En español se deletrea IRAK.
Posted by: Gustavo | April 26, 2007 at 08:31
What a dicq!
Posted by: Anthony Cartouche | April 26, 2007 at 08:40
Gustavo's right. Which is why we should put up a wall on the border to keep people like Timmy from polluting our Anglo-Protestant cultural essence.
Posted by: Jim M | April 26, 2007 at 08:41
Why is it "Democrats" vs. "President Bush"? Shouldn't it be "Democrats" vs. "Republicans"?
Because it's partly a Wall Street Journal poll, and for them, there are only two camps: those who swear undying fealty to Dear Leader, and the sane.
Posted by: LittlePig | April 26, 2007 at 09:12
Stupid is the only word to describe them.
Posted by: frenchdm | April 26, 2007 at 10:41
NYMary: Exactly. The Republicans have been trying to distance themselves from Bush by claiming that he's "betrayed Reagan's legacy" when in fact the senior Bushies are all recycled Nixon and Reagan staffers (http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/04/01/dearest-trex-might-i-borrow-your-axe-please/).
Bush is in fact the ultimate expression of Reagan's foul legacy (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040628/editors) -- he's what you get when you take the Republican themes of no-taxes-or-regulation-on-the-rich, mix with the Neo-Confederate "Southern Strategy" (remember Reagan's little speech at Philadelphia, Mississippi?) and add in a Republican Congress that spent the first six years of Bush's reign gleefully aiding and abetting his every move.
Posted by: Phoenix Woman | April 26, 2007 at 11:50
The video TVNewswer (MediaBistro) had up around 4 am (don't ask) had *bleeped out the "K"*--wiped it right off the tape--so that Timmeh appeared merely to be stuttering a little. Whodunnit? Was that from the West Coast airing of Nightly News? And was it Pumpkin Head himself who insisted that the "K" be consigned to oblivion? Inquiring minds...
Posted by: Swift Loris | April 26, 2007 at 11:57
But, but, but, Timmeh is a blue collar kind from Buffalo!!!!
Posted by: cosmosis | April 26, 2007 at 12:11
Dear Mr. Russert,
Can you Spell this?
I-N-C-O-M-P-E-T-E-N-T
S-T-E-N-O-G-R-A-P-H-E-R.
Posted by: feckless | April 26, 2007 at 12:44
4 werds
I are an illiterate
Posted by: Tim Russert | April 26, 2007 at 13:40
Bush is in fact the ultimate expression of Reagan's foul legacy (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040628/editors) -- he's what you get when you take the Republican themes of no-taxes-or-regulation-on-the-rich, mix with the Neo-Confederate "Southern Strategy" (remember Reagan's little speech at Philadelphia, Mississippi?) and add in a Republican Congress that spent the first six years of Bush's reign gleefully aiding and abetting his every move.
*
this sums it up nicely
Posted by: Nancy Willing | April 26, 2007 at 14:34