Today on Tommy T's Obsession With The Freeperati - a slow simmering boil
Good morning, trypto-fans! I hope everyone's gotten their individual post-Thanksgiving tummy issues out of the way, because between the sullen acceptance and hysterical blue-skying about a last minute reprieve (they're so cute when they hope against hope), it's going to take a strong stomach to handle the rapture of the Freep this week.
So - check those seals and air supplies - we're going in!
First up - I just can't get enough of those PUMA threads..
55 million conservatives better get
their act together, and FAST
11/06/08 | prismsinc
Posted on Thursday, November 06, 2008 9:31:35 AM by prismsinc
We need to network our activities people. The PUMAs fooled us. I saw the exit polling data, and it showed that single/divorced woman turned out for Eclair by a wide margin. We were duped by Hillary. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on ME. We are no doubt under seige. Fascists at the top, working class moderates/liberals and the poor at the bottom.
They are very well organized, and they plan to exterminate us. Right now, they're coordinating their next move on us. We can't get involved in our minute differences. We fundamentally have the same ideals. So wake up, true conservatives. No waffling, no cowardice, an certainly no naiivete(sic)!
11/06/08 | prismsinc
Posted on Thursday, November 06, 2008 9:31:35 AM by prismsinc
We need to network our activities people. The PUMAs fooled us. I saw the exit polling data, and it showed that single/divorced woman turned out for Eclair by a wide margin. We were duped by Hillary. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on ME. We are no doubt under seige. Fascists at the top, working class moderates/liberals and the poor at the bottom.
They are very well organized, and they plan to exterminate us. Right now, they're coordinating their next move on us. We can't get involved in our minute differences. We fundamentally have the same ideals. So wake up, true conservatives. No waffling, no cowardice, an certainly no naiivete(sic)!
To: prismsinc
They didn’t fool us, we fooled ourselves. We judged macro
trends by micro statements. In other words, the dozen or so PUMAs we read and
cheered for, we assumed where part of a macro movement, when in reality, they
where what they where at face value, a dozen or so PUMAs. We do that a
lot..
Why, yes - you do, don't you? It's pretty much gotten you where you are today.
To: prismsinc
The PUMAs fooled us.
And that's pretty amazing because
they didn't fool anyone else. I think the case is that you fooled yourselves.
Wake up and smell reality. I actually looked into the PUMA phenomenon and it was
incredibly easy to find out that it didn't exist. There were no more than a few
thousand PUMAs nationwide. You believed otherwise because you desperately wanted
to. It's called the Tinkerbell strategy. "If you believe hard enough, you can
save Tinkerbell." Guess what? It won't work four years from now either. How
about we wise up and stop blaming everyone else?
Yeah - that'll happen.
To: prismsinc
FR needs a disinformation detector ... they need it real
bad!
But FR is a disinformation detector. Every time I hear some stupid bit of disinformation, I cruise over to FR and sure enough - I detect it right there!
To: gussiefinknottle
(...) As the dust is settling I can’t believe we had a 72
year old man as our guy, as much as I admire him. Anyone under 50 is practically
a non-starter. It is true is that the left are not going to stop at winning the
election, I have insane liberal “friends” and they smell blood.
And tears. Don't forget the tears! Mmmmm - yummy tears!
More micturition and moaning after the jump, so go on - you know you want to.
As you can imagine, the massacre in Mumbai has cheered them up considerably, but there's one thing nagging at them.
And now, in the "But it has to be about us all the time" department...
India terror begins with corpses on
train platform
AP ^ | Nov. 30. 2008 | TIM SULLIVAN and RAVI NESSMAN
Posted on Sunday, November 30, 2008 12:59:19 AM by pillut48
"They were 10 gunmen, well-trained and armed with assault rifles and grenades, officials say. They had scouted their targets ahead of time. The knew the hallways and the basements. They even carried bags of almonds for energy. Police say they were Muslim extremists from Pakistan, and may be tied to India's long-running insurgency in the disputed, largely Muslim, Himalayan region of Kashmir..."
AP ^ | Nov. 30. 2008 | TIM SULLIVAN and RAVI NESSMAN
Posted on Sunday, November 30, 2008 12:59:19 AM by pillut48
"They were 10 gunmen, well-trained and armed with assault rifles and grenades, officials say. They had scouted their targets ahead of time. The knew the hallways and the basements. They even carried bags of almonds for energy. Police say they were Muslim extremists from Pakistan, and may be tied to India's long-running insurgency in the disputed, largely Muslim, Himalayan region of Kashmir..."
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
To: pillut48
“and may be tied to India’s long-running insurgency in the
disputed, largely Muslim, Himalayan region of Kashmir...””
Oh so that explains why they were looking for Americans and Jews.
Oh so that explains why they were looking for Americans and Jews.
No, Mr Cause-and effect, they were looking for victims.
What is this "MySpace" of which you speak?
Oh fer crying out loud, guys - even I have a MySpace page, and I'm freaking 57 years old!!
"We found bullets with them, hand grenades, bombs," R.R.
Patil, deputy chief minister of Maharashtra state, said at a news conference.
"Based on our investigation, we believe they had planned to kill 5,000
people." (CNN)
Wow. 5,000 Americans and Israelis ("Jew" is not a country, dumbass) all in one hotel. Right.
The murderers must have really hated their freedom to stay in hotels.
To: BurbankKarl
Meanwhile, claims that up to seven of the terrorists could have
been British men of Pakistani origin, who had connections to West Yorkshire,
were being widely discounted.
And a damned good thing too, as we are way too overextended to invade England.
The only thing more sickening than these vultures waving the bloody flag is when they're waving someone else's bloody flag.
And speaking of ridding the northern lands of undesirables...
Hitler - hateful, or just misunderstood?
Yanno, they have to be conflicted here.
On the one hand, Hitler would have shown those muzzies the showers, along with the gays and other troublemakers.
On the other hand...
Hmmm.
You can see why they're confused. They don't hate the neo-Nazis because the neo-Nazis hate dark people and "multiculturalism" and such - they hate them because they're so blatant about it.
Observe:
To: fanfan
Um - you have two personal pronouns in that sentence. Which "him" were you talking about hanging?
Relax boys, no one wants to take away your first amendment rights. We'd lose endless entertainment value, and it's much more effective to just make ghastly fun of you in public.
Or to put it another way:
And speaking of making ghastly fun of Freeperati - it looks like McCain isn't the only one behind the techno curve here....
The only thing more sickening than these vultures waving the bloody flag is when they're waving someone else's bloody flag.
And speaking of ridding the northern lands of undesirables...
Hitler - hateful, or just misunderstood?
Hitler 'had his reasons,' former
First Nations leader says
Canada.com ^ | Nov., 29, 2008 | BETTY ANN ADAM
Posted on Saturday, November 29, 2008 6:11:22 PM by fanfan
Disgraced First Nations leader David Ahenakew tried to explain his controversial comments about Nazism and the Jews during his hate crimes trial yesterday, saying Adolf Hitler "had his reasons" for his actions during the Second World War.
~snip~
Ahenakew also said he was bothered by the fact non-aboriginals had control in Canada because it had been "wrenched away" from First Nations.
"We were absolutely captive people in our own country," he said.
Canada.com ^ | Nov., 29, 2008 | BETTY ANN ADAM
Posted on Saturday, November 29, 2008 6:11:22 PM by fanfan
Disgraced First Nations leader David Ahenakew tried to explain his controversial comments about Nazism and the Jews during his hate crimes trial yesterday, saying Adolf Hitler "had his reasons" for his actions during the Second World War.
~snip~
Ahenakew also said he was bothered by the fact non-aboriginals had control in Canada because it had been "wrenched away" from First Nations.
"We were absolutely captive people in our own country," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at canada.com ...
Yanno, they have to be conflicted here.
On the one hand, Hitler would have shown those muzzies the showers, along with the gays and other troublemakers.
On the other hand...
Hmmm.
You can see why they're confused. They don't hate the neo-Nazis because the neo-Nazis hate dark people and "multiculturalism" and such - they hate them because they're so blatant about it.
Observe:
To: fanfan
Yah,I suppose he *did* “have his
reasons”.Slimy,filthy,despicable,amoral reasons...but reasons
nevertheless.
3 posted on Saturday, November 29, 2008
6:22:28 PM by Gay
State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bin ein beginner")
To: fanfan
Thanks for letting us see the fruits of multiculturalism.
To: fanfan
“A Native Indian, anti-Semite, Anti-white, nazi
supporter.”
Why is he on trial? Did he commit a crime or did he just have bad thoughts? Or even worse, did he express bad thoughts in public? If so, I guess we hang him in the marvelous, new hate-free world being ushered in by Obama.
And when we hang him, would that be our expression of love for him?
Why is he on trial? Did he commit a crime or did he just have bad thoughts? Or even worse, did he express bad thoughts in public? If so, I guess we hang him in the marvelous, new hate-free world being ushered in by Obama.
And when we hang him, would that be our expression of love for him?
Um - you have two personal pronouns in that sentence. Which "him" were you talking about hanging?
To: fanfan
"He hates our civilization." If our civilization, Canadian
style, puts people in prison for expressing opinions, however vile, then that is
something worth hating.
I'm thankful for the First Amendment. If the thought police punch through that barrier and get busy down here, many people on this forum will find themselves in the dock.
I'm thankful for the First Amendment. If the thought police punch through that barrier and get busy down here, many people on this forum will find themselves in the dock.
Relax boys, no one wants to take away your first amendment rights. We'd lose endless entertainment value, and it's much more effective to just make ghastly fun of you in public.
Or to put it another way:
A walk down the path of history is crunchy with the crispy corpses of
those who pooh-poohed or ignored the clown car of ridicule when it
pulled-up to the curb.
Stephen Jones, from alt.religion.scientology
And speaking of making ghastly fun of Freeperati - it looks like McCain isn't the only one behind the techno curve here....
What is this "MySpace" of which you speak?
Anyone here have a MySpace
Page?
11/29/08 | me
Posted on Saturday, November 29, 2008 10:49:29 PM by mdittmar
Don't be afraid,you can admit it;)
To: mdittmar
To: mdittmar
11/29/08 | me
Posted on Saturday, November 29, 2008 10:49:29 PM by mdittmar
Don't be afraid,you can admit it;)
To: mdittmar
no
To: mdittmar
no. why?
4 posted on Saturday, November 29, 2008
10:51:18 PM by nuconvert (
Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: mdittmar
I think there is a FR Facebook group, but I don’t know about
MySpace.
I don’t have either. Just a Flickr page.
I don’t have either. Just a Flickr page.
To: mdittmar
No, why ?
To: mdittmar
Proud to say both “no” and “never will.”
32 posted on Saturday, November 29,
2008 11:41:28 PM by Secret Agent
Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: mdittmar
What’s a MySpace?
31 posted on Saturday, November 29,
2008 11:39:36 PM by JimRed ("Hey, hey,
Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: mdittmar
No. I don’t see the need.
17 posted on Saturday, November 29,
2008 10:59:59 PM by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't
represent me.)
Oh fer crying out loud, guys - even I have a MySpace page, and I'm freaking 57 years old!!
To: lowbridge; All
Well,maybe we need a Conservative “surge” on all these
sites.
23 posted on Saturday, November 29,
2008 11:22:45 PM by mdittmar (May
God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
Yeah - that's the ticket. Then you could be laughed at by an entirely new group of people!To: mdittmar
“Well,maybe we need a Conservative “surge” on all these sites.”
I agree. But presented in such a way that it wakes up the fools and lets them
see how detrimental communism/socialism/0bamanism, etc. is to them.
SEE?To: luckystarmom
We need to learn how to use these sites to spread the
conservative agenda. I've always wondered how many converts a preacher gets
when he goes into a bar to preach to drunks.
I've also wondered how many of those preachers end up as drunks.
I've also wondered how many of those preachers end up as drunks.
Ah - don't mingle with the common people or some of that Obama-love might rub off on ya, right?
Got it.
By all means, stay in your zoo.
Lastly, Confusion about how to address the Gates' philanthropy:
See? I told you he was a bit kooky.
This next one manages to get racial hatred, culture wars, ODS, and guns all into the same paragraph:
Next week - more Bailey bulldog blogging, I promise.
Got it.
By all means, stay in your zoo.
Lastly, Confusion about how to address the Gates' philanthropy:
Bill and Melinda Gates prefer the
slums to cocktail parties
Times ^
Posted on Saturday, November 29, 2008 5:56:23 PM by traumer
For Bill and Melinda Gates family life is like a business: every six months they hold a meeting to decide what holidays they will be taking and what their children should be learning.
And despite being worth an estimated $58 billion (£37 billion), Mr and Mrs Gates would rather help out in the poorest parts of the world than be part of the cocktail party circuit that preoccupies the lives of many of the rich and famous. In an interview with The Times Magazine today, Mrs Gates says: “My mom says, ‘You know Melinda, people can’t understand why you enjoy visiting those places so much’. But I love being in the slums. That’s just a part of who I am.”
She also reveals that her husband, who made his fortune as head of Microsoft, often weeps at the stories of suffering.
They are equal partners in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which has received $17.3 billion of their wealth. For Mrs Gates, HIV/Aids “is the number one problem that needs to get solved – and all the different initiatives it’s going to take to line that up will see us involved for the history of the foundation”.
She says that the foundation has made advances with gels that are designed to prevent the transmission of Aids: “This is the most exciting development, and they are likely to be available in, hopefully, the next seven years.”
Times ^
Posted on Saturday, November 29, 2008 5:56:23 PM by traumer
For Bill and Melinda Gates family life is like a business: every six months they hold a meeting to decide what holidays they will be taking and what their children should be learning.
And despite being worth an estimated $58 billion (£37 billion), Mr and Mrs Gates would rather help out in the poorest parts of the world than be part of the cocktail party circuit that preoccupies the lives of many of the rich and famous. In an interview with The Times Magazine today, Mrs Gates says: “My mom says, ‘You know Melinda, people can’t understand why you enjoy visiting those places so much’. But I love being in the slums. That’s just a part of who I am.”
She also reveals that her husband, who made his fortune as head of Microsoft, often weeps at the stories of suffering.
They are equal partners in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which has received $17.3 billion of their wealth. For Mrs Gates, HIV/Aids “is the number one problem that needs to get solved – and all the different initiatives it’s going to take to line that up will see us involved for the history of the foundation”.
She says that the foundation has made advances with gels that are designed to prevent the transmission of Aids: “This is the most exciting development, and they are likely to be available in, hopefully, the next seven years.”
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
First, we have the lassez-faire capitalists. They think it's a bit kooky for someone to give away money (mineminemineminemine), but since Gates did what they can only aspire to (that is, get rich), they have to back him up:
To: traumer
It’s their money....they can do what they want with it and live
like hippies for all I care. Good on ‘em!
2 posted on Saturday, November 29, 2008
6:00:59 PM by Drango (A
liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: traumer
He worked hard, had the vision,allowed his employees to share
the wealth Yeah, he's a little kooky. But he seems OK in my books.
See? I told you he was a bit kooky.
This next one manages to get racial hatred, culture wars, ODS, and guns all into the same paragraph:
To: traumer
The whole American culture has been slumming, I’m afraid.
Suburban housewives listening to [c]rap “music” on the car radios, their sons
wearing their pants crotches near their ankles, worshipping the likes of O.J.
Simpson, or whoever the current illiterate equivalent of O.J. is, a
semi-literate author getting the Nobel Prize in Literature, and the next POTUS,
whatsisname? Slumming! And the likes of the Gates do their slumming with armed
bodyguards, no doubt.
Next, another one who can't pluralize (this must be a genetic trait, possibly the result of inbreeding):
No, the only problem is when you run out of breath while saying this out loud.
It's not just the matter of them not knowing the language they profess to love, or eschewing punctuation and paragraphs.
This is really just the way their thoughts free-associate as they spew out their hatreds and fears verbally, or on the printed page.
Tony Stark is calling Bill Gates an elitist??
You're the one with the jet-propelled underwear, chum.
Ah - back to normal.
Um - because cheap computerst wouldn't stop millions of people from dying with AIDS?
Just a guess here.
Of course, if they had oil, it'd be different.
And now, just to show that even a Freeper can be intentionally funny, I leave you with this:
Well, folks, that's it for this week.
As always, my thanks to Athenae for giving me the chance to post here, and my thanks to you for reading.
Let's get out of this wet HAZMAT gear and into a dry martini.
To: albie
my only problem is when socialist(sic) like these demand others to
pay more taxes yet they themselves stash their wealth in charity foundations so
that they themselves can decide where and when to spend their own money
No, the only problem is when you run out of breath while saying this out loud.
It's not just the matter of them not knowing the language they profess to love, or eschewing punctuation and paragraphs.
This is really just the way their thoughts free-associate as they spew out their hatreds and fears verbally, or on the printed page.
To: traumer
Just a heads-up to anyone who thinks Gates is “OK”, his
benefactors include anti-gun groups and pro-UN causes. Yes, it is his money, but
what he does with it is pure stereotypical elitist nonsense.
Tony Stark is calling Bill Gates an elitist??
You're the one with the jet-propelled underwear, chum.
To: traumer
That’s combined with the huge amounts they donate to
pro-abortion causes. I guess it’s better to stop all those nasty poor people -
and many, as in the US, who wouldn’t even be poor - from being born in the first
place.
I’ve never figured out why the Gates’ and the Packards want to contribute so much money to eradicating their potential customer base.
I’ve never figured out why the Gates’ and the Packards want to contribute so much money to eradicating their potential customer base.
Ah - back to normal.
To: traumer
which has received $17.3 billion of their wealth. For Mrs
Gates, HIV/Aids “is the number one problem that needs to get solved Why not
use that as capital and try to manufacture very cheap computers. With more
people able to buy computers, more people could buy his software.
15 posted on Saturday, November 29,
2008 6:18:53 PM by mjp (Live & let
live. I don't want to live in Mexico, Marxico, or Muslimico. Statism & high
taxes suck)
Um - because cheap computerst wouldn't stop millions of people from dying with AIDS?
Just a guess here.
Of course, if they had oil, it'd be different.
And now, just to show that even a Freeper can be intentionally funny, I leave you with this:
To: traumer
Maybe they would like to help me out of my sad situation , 10
million oughta do it . I have a big dent in my head from slamming it against my
keyboard when Vista freezes up . He should feel terrible about me .
12 posted on Saturday, November 29,
2008 6:12:12 PM by kbennkc (For
those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know
F/8 Cav)
As always, my thanks to Athenae for giving me the chance to post here, and my thanks to you for reading.
Let's get out of this wet HAZMAT gear and into a dry martini.
With regards to the following freeper post by "seowulf":
"I've always wondered how many converts a preacher gets when he goes into a bar to preach to drunks.
I've also wondered how many of those preachers end up as drunks."
Oh, Tommy, I fear so much that some day you'll go exploring the caverns of freeperdom and never come back. Just be careful down there, y'hear?
Posted by: | December 01, 2008 at 17:49
Not a chance.
Familiarity breeds contempt, especially with this lot, and I don't see that changing any time soon.
Every time I think they can't get any more moronic or repulsive, they prove me wrong.
Tommy
Posted by: Tommy T | December 02, 2008 at 05:34