Good morning gentle people! Time to get suited up and unbolt that first drum of toxic mental waste product that passes for discourse at Free Republic.
Uh oh. Looks like Caribou Barbie's lustful lemmings have had about enough of the FR skeptics who argue that she could screw up a two-car funeral, and would make Dubya look like a MENSA member:
Anti Palin comments are counter-productive and should not be tolerated among us. (Vanity)
myself
Posted on Saturday, November 14, 2009 12:57:36 PM by se_ohio_young_conservative
Those of you. You know who you are.I don't care who you are or what your reasoning is. Your siding with the maistream(sic) media against Palin is doing nothing to help Republicans or Conservatism in general. You are hurting your own cause.
And by "yours", I mean mineminemine.
Unless you are a DU troll. Or a liberal Republican who has no idea what the heck you are even talking about.
Or someone who puts periods. In the middle of sentences.
Ani Palin comments (such as "shes not fit to be President") should be seen as trolling and should not be tolerated on Free Republic, any conservative web site or any conservative setting. While I am not calling for anyone to be purged from this website. I, and others are going to keep a list of Palin hating trolls so the rest of you know who has credibility and who doesn't. who is a troll, and who isn't.
Uh oh. He's making a LIST! And possibly checking it twice...
We will know your posting history. We know where your opinons(sic) are coming from. The Palin bashing is getting old. And the cat calls will likely increase for Jim Robinson to do some fall cleaning if this continues.So, please. stop inflicting damage on conservatism.
1 posted on Saturday, November 14, 2009 12:57:37 PM by se_ohio_young_conservative
I'm sure he expected a rousing burst of support from his fellow Palin pud-pounders.
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeI thought you got this out of your system earlier this week.Look, folks have to defend Palin for themselves. She has all of the class in the world and she will rise above the crap..
If you want folks to stop saying things that are wrong or unfair, call them out.. make them prove the point, give the facts why they are wrong.
We don't make people shut up here. We just don't.
From Wiki:
Starting in April 2007 ... members sympathetic to the former mayor's candidacy claim to have suffered banishment from the site. They were victimized, they say, by a wave of purges designed to weed out any remaining support for the Giuliani campaign...
Robinson himself endorsed Fred Thompson and was an enthusiastic backer of his campaign.
Ok then, other that that, we just don't. Unless, of course, you mention Romney. And how'd that Fredhead thing work out for ya, Jimbo?
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeI’m pro-Palin. I’m anti-Shut-up-and-go-away-if-you-can’t-see-things-my-way. Smacks of small minds.
To: REDWOOD99
I understand. But geesh. It is wearing thin. And it is just what the left wants to see.
No, this is what the left wants to see - you guys setting the complete nutcases against the almost complete nutcases. And while you're busy knifing each other over perceived ideological purity, we'll just keep cleaning up the mess you guys left the last time you had your loathsome way.
Uh oh - here come the Palinbots!
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeWhenever some of our “self proclaimed” conservatives start taking pot shots at Palin and others like her, its a dead give away that they are really 5th columnists or moles. They post their garbage hoping to cause discord and defeatism among real conservatives.
To: SaveTheChief
It is not a debate. It is either a left wing attack or it is stupidity. Either way, it is counter productive.
Of course Palin is fit to be President. She has more exec experiance(sic) than the President we have now.
19 posted on Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:06:04 PM by se_ohio_young_conservative (Palin 2012)
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeI smell another purge coming.
To: se_ohio_young_conservative
I support Sarah Palin for President in 2012.
I also support free speech, and believe that the best thing to do with Palin bashers is either educate or ignore them.
In my opinion reducing Free Republic to a narrow base of people who agree with each other on everything isn’t going to achieve anything positive. Just the opposite.
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeI love Sarah Palin, however, I DO wish she would return to the Church, because I don't see how she can battle the evil administration that is now in place without the Sacraments. Here's a post of someone who has had "extreme" lust and pornography issues in his life. If he can curb these down to a minimum [he continually works at it] as he has done and speak so highly of the Church that is helping him to do it, imagine what Sarah Palin can do with the same Sacraments. It's mind boggling when one really thinks about it. "You betcha!"
To: se_ohio_young_conservative“I understand. But geesh. It is wearing thin.”
I thank the Lord that you are just a poster here and not someone with any real ability to force your views on the rest of the world.
32 posted on Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:09:36 PM by REDWOOD99
To: se_ohio_young_conservativePeople who post stupid vanities should not be tolerated among us.
Somehow, I'm just not feeling the love here.
Poor Freepers - standing up for free speech on their forum. Unless, of course, it's anything good about Giuliani, Ron Paul, John McCain (this year - may not apply to previous years), George W.Bush (also may not apply to previous years), Mitt Romney, Huckabee, or anything bad about Tea Parties (a leisure service of AT&T).
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeYou betcha. Maybe “anti-Palin” posters should have a gold star affixed to their screen names so they can be shunned more efficiently? Would that satisfy you Palin worshippers? Or perhaps a semi-annual Freeper test to root out “anti-Palinites?” If a Freeper doesn’t believe that Sara Palin is either God or Reagan reincarnated they should be banned from FreeRepublic. Or Better Yet!!! Just changed the freaking website name to “SarahPalinisGod.com!” /s
And now, ladies and gentlemen - the most wonderful description I have ever seen of the nutcases that populate Free Republic - posted in oblivious honesty by one of their own! Enjoy:
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeGood luck with that.We got:
Code Orange Freepers
Neo Confederates
Rabid Catholic Haters
Evo Nazis
Hard Core RINO’s
Secessionists,
and people holed up in bunkers that only post when they aren't looking through the gun slits for the black helicopters. Getting everyone on board to play nice ain't happening.
That's OK though, it's the sound of freedom. Just know that 99.9% of Freepers are just everyday people whose hearts and minds are in the right place. If they disagree with you on Palin, they agree with you somewhere else. Just move along to a different topic.45 posted on Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:14:47 PM by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
Now much I can add to that, I'm afraid.
More hot pockets of putrid potpourri after the AIEEEEEE!!!
Ok - that was more of a fall than a jump, but my catlike reflexes saved me.
Well, that thread still has some comedy gold to mine, so bear with me...
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeUmmm, telling thread se ohio. I don't recall all this angst when good longtime Freepers were purged when they discussed the possibility of Mayor Giuliani beating Hussein.81 posted on Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:24:45 PM by roses of sharon (A warrior assumes that he is already dead, so he might as well fight.)
Oh no - he did not go there.
To: Pan_YanThe Palin bashers have just as much right to post as the Palin Mania Lust Club with their constant Palin, Queen of All Thing Conervative, Warrior Princess, RINO Hunter, Savior of Democracy, Defender of the Republic pictures.
Honestly, when was the last time you were able to come onto FreeRepublic's front news page and, scrolling down from the very top to the very bottom, not see at least one piece of Palin spam?
In the over two months I've made a habit of looking, there has never once been a Palin article-free page. And yet these same people are generally the ones who go ballistic whenever they see the lone positive article on Romney or Huckabee once in a blue moon.
162 posted on Saturday, November 14, 2009 2:34:54 PM by GoldStandard
I'll let Ben Ficklin have the last word:
To: se_ohio_young_conservativeYou are dumber than Palin
115 posted on Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:37:51 PM by Ben Ficklin
Ouchie.
Ok - enough of that - let's do some catching up.
Rasmussen, Rasmussen, why has thou forsaken me?
Rasmussen 2012 GOP race: Huckabee 29% Romney 24% Palin 18%
Rasmussen ^ | 10.16.09 | RasmussenPosted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:33:36 AM by rface
Twenty-nine percent (29%) of Republican voters nationwide say former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee is their pick to represent the GOP in the 2012 Presidential campaign. The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey finds that 24% prefer former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney while 18% would cast their vote for former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich gets 14% of the vote while Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty gets 4%. Six percent (6%) of GOP voters prefer some other candidate while 7% remain undecided.
These numbers reflect an improvement for Huckabee since July when the three candidates were virtually even. Huckabee’s gain appears to be Palin’s loss as Romney’s support has barely changed.
click at link for more polling details:
(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...
To: rfaceThis should be an interesting thread.
2 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:35:30 AM by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
I agree.
To: rfaceHuckabee = George W. Bushie No 2 NO THANKS!
3 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:36:00 AM by US Navy Vet
To: rfaceSickening. It’s almost a joke, the lack of a decent choice.
9 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:38:04 AM by NonstatistTo: rfaceWe’re in a lot of trouble if Republicans really do favor Huckabee and Romney. Both of them have demonstrated histories of governing as “pragmatic” big-government types. Doesn’t anyone pay attention?
12 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:38:57 AM by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
To: rfaceThe GOP will lose my vote if that is the case - Palin or no one!
16 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:39:43 AM by Patrsup (To stubborn to change now)
To: rfaceHuckabee is a snake oil salesman.
18 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:39:52 AM by NautiNurse (Obama: A day without TOTUS is like a day without sunshine)
To: US Navy VetI’m with you. Huckabee wins the GOP nomination I vote libertarian even if it means Obozo wins. Huckabee governed Arkansas like a dem. By that time Congress should be in GOP hands anyway so we can start reversing the damage.
I could vote for Romney if I had to, but prefer Palin.
20 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:40:09 AM by Spartan79
To: Spartan79NO MITT! EVER!
21 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:40:51 AM by US Navy Vet
Kibitzer - pass the butter please?
To: AllI have a novel idea...How bout THIS time we dont let the Media pick a candidate and ram it down our throats, ALA McCain!!!!
Huckabee? Have we lost our collective minds?!!!!!! (rhetorical)
Duncan Hunter deserves another shot!!
To: rface
Screw Huck and Romney. I will NEVER vote for either of them. Never. Ever.
31 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:43:03 AM by rintense
To: rface2012 will be a landslide for Obama. I think I’ll away camping/fishing the first week of November 2012.
37 posted on Friday, October 16, 2009 11:46:01 AM by DogBarkTree (Support Sarah. http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#/sarahpalin?ref=nf)
From your lips to God's ear...
What's next?
Ah - After two days of deafening silence about this at FR.....
Jon Stewart Catches Sean Hannity Passing Off 9-12 Tea Party Footage For Bachmann Protest
The Examiner ^ | 11/12/09 | Ryan Witt
Posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:49:59 AM by steve-b
After the 9-12 Tea Party protest a debate emerged regarding the crowd size estimates. Organizers of the event like Glenn Beck said that over 500,000 were at the rally while more "conservative" estimates like those from the Washington D.C. Fire Department had the crowd being a much smaller 60,000-70,000. Even the lower estimate is a respectable number of people for a protest on Capitol Hill and the event certainly received a lot of coverage from all the networks....
Not surprisingly Fox News tended to support the larger of the crowd size estimates. Sean Hannity led this charge showing clips of a large protest around Capitol Hill. However as Jon Stewart points out in the video clip below Hannity was actually showing footage of the 9-12 Tea Party protest and trying to pass it off as footage of the Bachmann event....
To: steve-bHannity never said that the footage was from the Bachmann event.
2 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:52:12 AM by Kleon
To: steve-bFOX’s Sean Hannity To Daily Show’s Jon Stewart “You Were Right”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0bzYL2kAiU7 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:56:58 AM by Brandonmark (News Coverage)
To: steve-b
That's no way to talk about Sean Hannity. For shame.
To: FlightdeckHe sound have said that it was from another event. We have to be scrupulously honest and we would be trumpeting this if it happened to Olbermann.
9 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 7:58:38 AM by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
Ya think??
To: KleonOn the screen it said EARLIER. As in earlier that day. There needs to be an explaination(sic). It could have been an innocent mistake.
13 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:04:36 AM by christianhomeschoolmommaof3 (Best thing about Cash for Clunkers is that 90% of the Obama bumper stickers are now off the road.)
And this land in East Texas I have to sell you could have oil on it.
To: RussSorry.
“Plausible Deniability” isn’t going to cover it.It’s Sean’s show.
It has his name on it, not the producer’s.Hold his feet to the fire in an appropriate manner.
If a lefty did this, I’d expect some outrage as well.
To: steve-b
I think that is likely the work of some intern, and is not the first glaring mistake I’ve seen on Fox (witness some of the dreadful spelling errors in the bottom screen scrawl).
They need to start considering some factors other than blondeness and cup size when choosing their interns.
26 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:38:37 AM by Buckeye McFrog
To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3OR it could have been one of the NYC mindset staffers who put it in and then “leaked” it.
29 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:49:59 AM by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: steve-bHannity is dangerous to our side.ML/NJ
31 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:10:32 AM by ml/nj
Uh oh! They're on to us!! Buggy Q, quick - cancel Operation Mannity at once, and I want a First Draft commando team to go in and get our guy out right now!
To: BrandonmarkLove these kind of threads....it really exposes some Freepers.
37 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:50:18 AM by roses of sharon (A warrior assumes that he is already dead, so he might as well fight.)
To: roses of sharonYeah — you can tell who values the truth, and who values nothing but partisan hackery.
40 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:12:29 AM by steve-b (Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
To: steve-bTake a walk, Lib.
41 posted on Thursday, November 12, 2009 11:30:49 AM by roses of sharon (A warrior assumes that he is already dead, so he might as well fight.)
What else do we have here - ah....
SUCKERS!
Conservative Blogs fall for Scam Blog Post About Obama Paper on Constitution
Friday, October 23, 2009 | Kristinn
Posted on Friday, October 23, 2009 1:32:03 PM by kristinn
Two months ago, the blog Jumping in Pools, which has been banned from FR for its chain-yanking postings of bogus news stories, posted a bogus story about Time magazine writer Joe Klein supposedly reporting on Barack Obama's writings at Columbia University about the Constitution.
Apparently without doing any research to see if Klein had actually written such an article, respected sites including American Thinker and Pajamas Media got all excited about the story and reported it today as if it were true.
They apparently hadn't noticed there was no source link at Jumping in Pools back to the supposed Joe Klein article. A search of the web produced no original source. A search of Time magazine for the term "Aristocracy Reborn", the supposed title of Obama's paper, returned this message: "Your search produced no results."
To: kristinnRush was talking about this today on his program. He was reporting it as being right.
2 posted on Friday, October 23, 2009 1:34:18 PM by native texan
That's because his pilonidal cyst has finally throttled his brainstem.
To: GoCards
Like false reporting from "conservative outlets" is somehow hard to find...
To: kristinnFake, but accurate.
24 posted on Friday, October 23, 2009 1:41:17 PM by Jim Robinson (Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jimrobfr)
JIM! Where did you go? I was counting on you!!
To: kristinn
Well? Who ya gonna believe? Rush, or those lying facts??
Lastly, we have - ROP - take two!
Breaking News: Orlando Shooting
MyFreePress ^ | 11/6/2009 | Jason
Posted on Friday, November 06, 2009 11:46:14 AM by myfreepress
Another shooting on the very day we vote in Health Care.
ORLANDO, Fla. -- At least eight people were shot inside a downtown Orlando high-rise Friday morning.
Firefighters were called to Gateway Center at 1000 Legion Place around 11:30 a.m. The building is near Lake Ivanhoe.
All patients have been taken to Orlando Regional Medical Center. At least four of the eight patients are serious trauma cases.
To: myfreepress
We are all so very relieved.
To: JFCYEah, but what if it’s not “copy cat” but CELL-related?
13 posted on Friday, November 06, 2009 11:52:36 AM by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: ermanMust be another Muslim and the MSM does not want to admit it...maybe viewers will think blue jeans are synonymous with Christians....
38 posted on Friday, November 06, 2009 12:09:31 PM by mikelets456
To: JFCListening to the Orlando Sheriff on the Scanner app on my iPhone right now...
Suspect is described as a Hispanic Male.
18 posted on Friday, November 06, 2009 11:57:24 AM by Rodney Dangerfield (The CIC is AWOL and is committing derilection of duty.)
A Messican?? Well, that's almost as bad, innit?
Of course, hope springs eternal :
To: Rodney DangerfieldHispanic and Middle Eastern can look similar.
43 posted on Friday, November 06, 2009 12:15:10 PM by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: LSNo, last time it was a Muslim, this time it’s a Cuban or Mexican (maybe, by the name Rodriguez and the way he looked) and before that it was a white guy (McVeigh, blowing up some building) and next time it’s liable to be a Chinese or Japanese guy.
Some US mass shootings...
Here is a glance at some of the worst U.S. mass shootings:
April 3, 2009: A 41-year-old man opened fire at an immigrant community center in Binghamton, N.Y., killing 11 immigrants and two workers. Jiverly Wong, a Vietnamese immigrant and a former student at the center, killed himself as police rushed to the scene.
March 10, 2009: Michael McLendon, 28, killed 10 people, including his mother, four other relatives and the wife and child of a local sheriff’s deputy, across two rural Alabama counties. He then committed suicide.
Feb. 14, 2008: Former student Steven Kazmierczak, 27, opened fire in a lecture hall at Northern Illinois University in DeKalb, fatally shooting five students and wounding 18 others before committing suicide.
Dec. 5, 2007: Robert A. Hawkins, 19, opened fire with a rifle in Omaha, Neb., at a Von Maur store in the Westroads Mall, killing eight people before taking his life. Five more people were wounded, two critically.
April 16, 2007: Cho Seung-Hui, 23, fatally shot 32 people in a dorm and a classroom at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, then killed himself in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.
Feb. 12, 2007: Sulejman Talovic, 18, killed five and wounded four at the Trolley Square mall in Salt Lake City. He was then shot and killed by police.
Oct. 2, 2006: Charles Carl Roberts IV, 32, shot to death five girls at West Nickel Mines Amish School in Pennsylvania, then killed himself.
March 21, 2005: Jeffrey Weise, a 16-year-old student, killed nine people – his grandfather and his grandfather’s companion at home, and then five fellow students, a teacher and a security guard at Red Lake High School in Red Lake, Minn. – before killing himself. Seven students were wounded.
March 12, 2005: Terry Ratzmann, 44, gunned down members of his congregation as they worshipped at the Brookfield Sheraton in Brookfield, Wis., slaying seven and wounding four before killing himself.
July 29, 1999: Former day trader Mark Barton, 44, killed nine people in shootings at two Atlanta brokerage offices, then committed suicide.
April 20, 1999: Students Eric Harris, 18, and Dylan Klebold, 17, opened fire at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colo., killing 12 classmates and a teacher and wounding 26 others before committing suicide in the school’s library.
March 24, 1998: Andrew Golden, 11, and Mitchell Johnson, 13, killed four girls and a teacher at a Jonesboro, Ark., middle school. Ten others were wounded in the shooting.
Oct. 16, 1991: George Hennard, 35, smashed his pickup through a Luby’s Cafeteria window in Killeen, Texas, and fired on the lunchtime crowd with a high-powered pistol, killing 22 people. At least 20 others were wounded.
Aug. 20, 1986: Postal worker Patrick Henry Sherrill killed 14 people in an Edmond, Okla., post office, then killed himself.
July 18, 1984: James Oliver Huberty, 41, an out-of-work security guard, shot and killed 21 people at a McDonald’s restaurant in San Ysidro, Calif. He was slain by police.
Aug. 1, 1966: Former Marine sharpshooter Charles Whitman climbed the stairs to the observation deck at the University of Texas Tower and began a 96-minute shooting spree, killing 14 people and wounding 31 before he was shot and killed. He had stabbed his mother and wife to death earlier.
On and on it goes...
58 posted on Friday, November 06, 2009 1:06:55 PM by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
Let's see - that makes a zipperhead, a chink, a Bosnian, and FOURTEEN "real Americans", two of them Marines.
This kind of makes the case for racially profiling Bubbas, not Muhammads.
Well, that wraps it up for this week (I told you these next few were going to be long).
Stephen King once used the phrase "Like a pillow fight where all the pillows have been treated with a low grade poison gas". That's how I feel after a few hours in Freeperville.
And now, without further ado, some bonus Bailey Bulldog blogging!
"Boss, nobody's gonna make off with your subwoofer while I'm on guard."
One of the first blog-based books, the anthology Special Plans examines Feith's role in misleading America into war. Buy from 
you're a braver man than i to wade through that intellectual sewer
Posted by: The Crapture | November 23, 2009 at 12:11
*) Can we profile Marines as they are trained to shoot and have used it 2 of the 14 times ???
*) Just love the person talking about Palin and the Sacraments. Talking of the Sacraments is rather Catholic / Episcopalian and Palin's church is rather non-traditional.
*) Palin 2012. Maybe the Mayans were right. Palin runs in 2012, gets elected in Nov 2012, and the world ends Dec 2012. It all makes sense now. It all makes sense !
Posted by: MapleStreet | November 23, 2009 at 13:10
Aw, man, did you have to do that to Raphael? That's one of my all-time fave paintings, and now it's just...eeew....
Posted by: BuggyQ | November 23, 2009 at 15:03
'99.9% of Freepers are just everyday people whose hearts and minds are in the right place.' If by right place he means up their collective asses.
Posted by: mikefromtexas | November 23, 2009 at 22:35
Not untill we’re out of here and decontaminated. We can have it while we watch the tape.
Posted by: Kibitzer 2006 | November 24, 2009 at 02:02
I note the snark, but abishai seems to understand how these Freeperati think. Funny though, it seems that the GOP is actually having similar thoughts. They’re considering their own Purity Test (via TPMDC). It’s a 10-question test (no Palin questions), with 80% being a Pass. Anything less gets you barred from all party money and official support. We can only hope they adopt it.
--Kibitzer
Posted by: Kibitzer 2006 | November 24, 2009 at 02:43
"Funny though, it seems that the GOP is actually having similar thoughts. They’re considering their own Purity Test (via TPMDC)."
Kibitzer
The really funny thing about that is (as Olbermann pointed out last night) that Reagan himself wouldn't have been able to pass their "Reagan test".
Posted by: Tommy T | November 24, 2009 at 04:51