Go Mobile

  • Bookmark the mobile version of First Draft HERE!

Donate

to First Draft

Tip Jar

Ads

Blogads

Ad Network

  • advertise_liberally

Paying the Bills

Blog powered by Typepad

First Draft Krewe in NOLA


  • Click above image for our Hurricane Katrina coverage, including photos and stories from our recent First Draft New Orleans trip.

Lower 9th Ward: March 2006

  • 23
    These are stills captured from video shot March 2006 in the Lower 9th Ward of New Orleans specifically the area between N. Claiborne, Florida Ave, Tupelo and Tennessee.

Lower 9th Ward: August 2006

  • 9th_marking_side
    These are photos and stills captured from video taken August 2006 of the Lower 9th Ward specifically the area between N. Claiborne, Florida Ave, Tupelo and Tennessee.

Paying The Bills

« He's Got This | Main | Avante Garde you make me hard »

December 02, 2009

Comments

They really said that about Steve Guttenberg?

I had to make sure I expressly told my folks I do NOT want a Kindle or similar for xmas - I'm a 'real book' gal - I can't even deal with 'books on tape/c.d.'. It's just how I'm wired. I'm not against them, but I'm not into them. If I fall asleep after reading and my paperback falls off the bed...no worries. A couple of hundred dollar doohdah hurtles over the edge and it's time for tears.
That's just me.

Oh, great. Now, not only do I have to worry about screaming babies and box-cutter wielding terrorists on my next flight, I also have to worry about some anti-elitist elitist whacking me in the face because I *dare* read my Kindle on the plane instead of carting around the six pounds of books and magazines I *used* to have to carry on the plane.

For a bright person, he's awfully stupid. Dude, I don't need you saving me from anything.

And for the record, I love the smell of my Kindle, too.

And another thing--I'm baffled by the binary aspect of the pro/anti-Kindle argument. Just because I own a Kindle doesn't mean I don't still buy and read hard copy books. You don't give up your right to love the look, feel, and smell of "real" books when you buy an e-book reader. And, incidentally, as e-books make inroads into colleges and universities, they're actually making it cheaper for students to get their textbooks. When a standard textbook in print form runs around $100, it doesn't take very many classes to make up the cost of the Kindle. Pretty much the antithesis of elitist.

It's just a tool, Sherman. And no, I don't mean the kind of tool you are.

Also, Buggy, there's an argument to be made that digital music and books actually increase consumption.

And the black/white thing is kind of what pisses me off. "I don't like them, they're bad, here's a bunch of stuff I pulled out of my butt to prove that I'm right."

I'm not necessarily opposed to e-books but I am very much opposed to the Kindle and any other proprietary "reading" device. But I'd have to get into the absurd state of our copyright laws to explain further and who wants that?

Oh, and who wants to attend a good ol' fashioned Kindle burning? Where's the tradition in that?


.

"Oh, and who wants to attend a good ol' fashioned Kindle burning? Where's the tradition in that?"

Not to rain on your irony parade, spork (can I play the tuba?), but that's one key reason I actually think the Kindle (by which I mean any e-book reader--there are several besides the Kindle out there or in the works) is a good thing--it's awfully hard to control information in the digital age. Yes--a book or a pamphlet can be burned, but the digital version of that book can be redistributed instantly. Imagine Solzhenitsyn in the age of digital books.

Incidentally, there are far more non-Amazon books on my Kindle than there are Amazon books. Thank you, Project Gutenberg, Feedbooks and Manybooks. Another good argument for the non-elitism--the collection of books I got for free on my Kindle (because they're out of copyright) would have cost me, minimally, $300. Dickens, Austen, Poe, Machiavelli, Gibbon, Dante, Boccaccio, Keats, Shelley...

My heart bleeds for the poor kids who can't afford a E-book device. After all they now just flock to the bookstores to pay $20 for a paperback book to read, so that pleasure will be denied to them. I think what we really should do is outlaw libraries that don't require you to pay book authors every time you check out a book. That would really help the poor children.

I don't have a Kindle, but I hope to get a Nook for Christmas. (No, not nookie! I can spell.)

Aw, dammit. I hate it when people I like say stupid shit like this. I adore Sherman Alexie's writing. I also adore my Kindle. Absolutely adore it. Didn't want one, didn't ask for one, but my husband got it for my last birthday and now I'm a believer. Thought I was a real-book purist, and it turns out I'm not. I totally heart my Kindle, and if Sherman Alexie sees me with it on the plane, he can kiss my elitist ass.

Elitists never see themselves as elitists, just trend setters. I'm just saying...

I do not have one of those kindle-thingeys. I prefer to check books from the library or to buy them used on Amazon or even better, in musty old bookstores where you peruse for hours. For me it's a way of spending a morning or afternoon. Sometimes you're rewarded, sometimes not. One thing about the digital revolution that worries me personally: I have about 50 to 60 books next to my bed. Some belong to me, some are borrowed from either the library or friends, most are used but a few are new. Before I bring a book home and put it in that pile, I do stop and consider the size of that pile. I can see having a Kindle with hundreds if not thousands of books on it, all waiting to be read. Maybe some of you are more disciplined readers than am I. How will I go about choosing my next book to read? Oy! I'm getting a headache worrying about it. My closest friend loves her Kindle, but she limits it to travel because she can take a dozen or so books with her without having to physically carry a dozen or so books, but she's disciplined. I'm not. I saw Mr. Alexie being interviewed. He may have just been looking for a way to differentiate himself from the pack. If I'd have been interviewing him, I'd have asked him how he feels about books on tape?

Cheers!

i took about 6 books to denmark to last 3 weeks. sure, i did leave the caligula and the collected hitchhikers there, but it was not that hard to pack them.

all hail the PRINTED word. jeez, wuthering height was a downer.

I keep looking at the Kindle, then at my bulging bookshelves of O'Reilly technical tomes (most in need of newer, revised editions) and think how nice it would be to carry that entire library in a cargo pocket.

But if I can't get everything I need for the Kindle, then it won't help me. I'm still an inveterate page flipper and couldn't see giving up my paper library, but when I'm lying on my back staring up and under cables in the server room, a Kindle sure sounds nice.

BuggyQ -

As we learned last Summer Amazon - or whomever - can "enter" your reading device and simply delete books. It's also obvious that if, say, a court orders unsold (and the key here is "unsold") books to be pulped there's every expectation they could also order Amazon - or whomever - to delete all the copies on e-readers. E-books could also be "altered" for any reason from afar.

When you buy a paper book it's yours (you can even give it away or re-sell it!) When you spend money on an e-book you're merely purchasing a license to read it at the copyright holder's pleasure.

Nobody who knows me would ever call me a Luddite but I'm siding with Alexie on this one.


.

Also, if there's a major, long lasting power outage (and given the state of our infrastructure there could be) you can always read a book by daylight or candlelight.

The Kindle, not so much.

Also also, it strikes me as appropriate that "Kindle" sound an awful lot like "kindling".


.

The argument Alexie's making here is actually one I've heard made and made myself with regard to the newspaper debate. That it ignores the very real digital divide in this country to say the future is online and online only. A lot more people have a buck for the paper than have $200 for the Kindle or an iPhone or whatever we're supposed to be turning papers into these days. This is a media problem of course; if all your kids and all your friends' kids have iPhones you're gonna think all kids have iPhones.

That being said, it's not Amazon's responsibility in the entire to solve poverty in this country, and you can use a tool for many tasks. Just because it's not immediately egalitarian doesn't mean it won't be.

Mr. A wants a Nook for Xmas. I can't get past the name. It's what my goddaughter called a pacifier.

A.

A, I'm not saying Alexie is misguided to worry about those issues. Access/the digital divide is a real issue, as is the security/privacy issue.

I'm saying he's a lousy steward for those concerns- his arguments - and I've read/seen four or five- are emotional rants and it's clear (to me) he can't get his own ego/emotion out of the way to make a good case for them. So, imho, he just comes off like a WATB, rather than a force of reason.

I'm with Spork. Speaking as someone who creates intellectual property for a living, mostly under work-for-hire agreements, I get really tetchy about the kind of thing we saw with Amazon this past summer. I am really nervous about this new business model the corporatocrats are pushing, whereby you never actually own anything, you just license it indefinitely. The difference is like the difference between a right and a privilege -- privileges can be revoked at any time, unilaterally, and don't apply universally. If I pay money for something, I don't want to wake up one morning and find that the company I thought I "bought" it from has unilaterally decided I don't have the right to access the content I paid for anymore.

I'm also leery of DRM-enabled electronic content delivery devices for two reasons: First of all, what if I create content and the device doesn't recognise me as a "legitimate" copyright holder, even though I am, so I'm not able to use my own content I created on my own digital device? (This was a legitimate concern about Windows Vista in the early going, as I recall, and the DRM scheme was yanked and significantly modified in response to user disapproval.)

Secondly, I live in Canada. Our copyright laws are different here: For one thing, I pay a hefty levy on all blank media (CDs, DVDs, tapes, etc.) to the Canadian version of the RIAA (SOCAN) in order to purchase the right to copy things freely from one medium to another et cetera, paid in advance.

I don't want to be forced to adhere to the frankly draconian US copyright laws through some kind of shrinkwrap/clickthrough EULA or something, you know, the usual boilerplate like "This content is provided in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware," or whatever. Screw that. I don't think those EULAs are even enforceable half the time, but I'd really rather not go through something like the Jon Johansen case (where the US government decided that a Norwegian computer programmmer should go to jail in the US for doing something legal in Norway that was illegal in the US, simply because it fucked with the DMCA) to prove it legally, thank you.

Anybody who's been following electronic intellectual property stuff for as long as I have has got a lot of good reasons to be really, really chary.

As a librarian, I get this a lot from administrators who want to cut budgets versus patrons who point out that reading speed and comprehension slows online.

And free online book repositories, like Guttenberg, tend to have items which are no longer under copyright - do you want your physicians using 80 year old textbooks ?

Of course, I remember the arguments from 20 years ago that microfische was gonna replace books.

does kindle have 1903 encyclopedia britannicas available?

wading thru Epicurius last night.

found reducing efficiency keep hypothesis country reviews united

[url=http://www.giss.nasa.gov]pdf stance technology[/url] [url=http://www.lbaeco.org]functionality weathering exempt[/url] [url=http://web.mit.edu]computer 2005 reduction findings open[/url]

Fascinating conversation. Interrobang: didn't know that difference in Canadian vs. American law. Very insightful and informative. That's a good direction to consider. I want singers, bands, writers, and all other participants whose work is routinely expropriated to get a kick-back. I've never wanted to get rich off of any one person, but if everyone in the world gave me a penny to hear my song, read my poem, laugh at my YouTube video, etc., I'd be more than satisfied. If newspapers are going to be saved, they're going to have to figure out a way for us to give them that penny.

The toughest indian in the world has the reservation blues over a little ol kindle. Maybe he should challange kindle to a fist fight in heaven.

decreases activity capacity leading values keep estimate cupcake

The comments to this entry are closed.

Contact Info

  • Adrastos
    adrastos at bellsouth.net
  • Athenae - Allison Hantschel
    athenae25 at yahoo.com
  • Jude
    jude_t at live.com

Athenae's Books

Stats