I haven't been following the Christmas Day underwear bomber wannabe story that closely. I'm numb to wingnut hissy fits, lies and fear mongering; it just doesn't irk me as much as it used to. In short, I'm an irk shirker...
There is, however, a pressing question for the underwear bomber guy that needs to be answered: boxers or briefs?


One of the first blog-based books, the anthology Special Plans examines Feith's role in misleading America into war. Buy from 
Boxers.
Photo here.
[Irk shirker. I love it.]
Posted by: Marc | December 29, 2009 at 22:41
eh, depends
Posted by: preznit giv me turkee | December 29, 2009 at 22:50
any doubts as to your commitment are silenced when you put the bomb in your underpants.
Posted by: HK | December 29, 2009 at 23:25
the term, of course, is Crotch Rocket.
Posted by: outrage broken | December 29, 2009 at 23:53
You people are just amateurs.
When searching for the joke here, it's not the type of underpants where the comedy gold lies; it's the brand.
Fruit of the Kaboom.
Posted by: Jude | December 30, 2009 at 04:59
Fruit of the Kaboom is awesome, but Fruit of the Boom scans better.
Posted by: Snarkworth | December 30, 2009 at 06:05
CNN actually published a picture of the undy bomb. It was neither boxers nor briefs. Looked more like Depends.
Posted by: Southern Beale | December 30, 2009 at 07:40
Yeah, Snarkworth, you're right. It's what I get for trying to make a joke before 5 a.m.
What I wanted to say was, simply "Fruit of Kaboom."
Posted by: Jude | December 30, 2009 at 08:06
The Undabomber?
Posted by: darrelplant | December 30, 2009 at 08:40
Good stuff, folks. I'm enjoying playing straight man.
Posted by: Adrastos | December 30, 2009 at 09:30
I'm looking forward to my next flight, where I assume we will all be asked to remove our underpants as we go through security?
Posted by: hoppy | December 30, 2009 at 09:35
Yeah, but if you don't wear any, be careful not to say you are 'going commando' - you'll end up in manacles... ;)
Posted by: Elspeth Ravenwind | December 30, 2009 at 09:52
If it's not too early to make a joke, you can argue they might have been boxers once, but now they're definitely briefs.
Also: saw a clip of cretin Pat Buchanan (but I repeat myself) self-righteously insisting that we torture Abdulmutallab in some way, specifically suggesting he be denied pain medication. My question is: the guy was willing to literally neuter himself -- which ought to be a very clear indication he's a nut, no pun intended. Buchanan thinks he can hurt him any more?
Posted by: Michael | December 30, 2009 at 10:54
I'm waiting for them to hand out little paper underpants like those little paper booties they give you when they need you to take your shoes off...
Posted by: Doc | December 30, 2009 at 11:29
Also: saw a clip of cretin Pat Buchanan (but I repeat myself) self-righteously insisting that we torture Abdulmutallab in some way, specifically suggesting he be denied pain medication.
And why would we do this? Because. Dammit.
Bucky has a better grasp of logic than Uncle Pat and Bucky eats things he finds on the floor.
A.
Posted by: Athenae | December 30, 2009 at 11:49
Didn't Mark Foley eat things he found on the Floor?
Hey-o!
Posted by: Jude | December 30, 2009 at 12:26
What, no bambooty here? It's the latest in undie fibers.
Posted by: liprap | December 30, 2009 at 12:32
i am surprised we don't have to change into airline clothes for flights. or fly in out underwear.
Posted by: pansypoo | December 30, 2009 at 14:48
Somehow I picture a bureau somewhere. Their job is to come up with the most irksome idea they can make airline passengers abide by.
The bureau uses every instance of someone arrested as a terrorist to put through their new-found anti-terror weapon. They're already using this guy to push for the high-tech strip search machines. Next bomber and you'll have to fly naked.
BTW - about the high tech visualization machines: Every prisoner knows you can stash things in your underside. Take some C-4 and put it in an acceptable shape. If I can figure that out, why can't TSA and Al Q?
Posted by: MapleStreet | December 30, 2009 at 15:42