Go Mobile

  • Bookmark the mobile version of First Draft HERE!

Donate

to First Draft

Tip Jar

Ads

Blogads

Ad Network

  • advertise_liberally

Paying the Bills

Blog powered by Typepad

First Draft Krewe in NOLA


  • Click above image for our Hurricane Katrina coverage, including photos and stories from our recent First Draft New Orleans trip.

Lower 9th Ward: March 2006

  • 23
    These are stills captured from video shot March 2006 in the Lower 9th Ward of New Orleans specifically the area between N. Claiborne, Florida Ave, Tupelo and Tennessee.

Lower 9th Ward: August 2006

  • 9th_marking_side
    These are photos and stills captured from video taken August 2006 of the Lower 9th Ward specifically the area between N. Claiborne, Florida Ave, Tupelo and Tennessee.

Paying The Bills

« WWTFUS: You said it was night inside my heart, it was | Main | Blame It On Cain »

May 26, 2010

Comments

Giordano is making an implied metaphor of priority and consequence, just because you feel offended doesn't disqualify the
relevant political analysis

I don't feel offended. His analysis is for shit. I normally like his work, but he's wrong on this one. My use of a computer isn't the problem. Unregulated corporate activity is the problem.

I don't want anyone yelling and pointing fingers. I want BP to pay for the consequences of their shoddy bullshit, and I want more and better regulation of offshore drilling.

We're not going to change our oil-dependent society; for the last couple of centuries, human economic activity on this planet has been dependent on the burning of fossil fuels. That's a fact. It may not be ideal, but it's a fact. Until the cost of extracting and using those fuels is greater than alternatives, it'll continue to be a fact.

The question, then, is this: How do we extract and use those fuels in the safest possible way, and with the least long-term adverse effects? Coming up with solutions to that isn't pointless wanking, and educating people about the choices and consequences isn't, either.

It is becoming clear that BP recklessly gambled with this in order to speed up the process (spend less money to earn more profit). At this time only BP can stop the oil gushing into the ocean, so I support their efforts, and want nothing to interfere with those efforts. But, once the gushing is stopped, BP, and their executives, need to accept some very extreme consequences, like jail for the executives and bankruptcy for the corporation. I see this as two separate subjects.

people love their cars. god, they might have to WALK!

"We're not going to change our oil-dependent society"

You can't say that and then reasonably expect to change he behavior of oil corporations. They are part of society too. You have to pick some angles of attach to the problem, accept some consequences, and act. Wanting the same world only with BP less of a fucking asshole is great but how do you get from A to B?

I'm with Olbermann -- where the hell are all those supertankers that belong to all the oil companies, not just BP, that could be shifted in to suck up the oil now, now, now?

I should've said that we can't change our oil-dependent society overnight and without other sources of available energy. Sorry, was being hasty.

Even without that qualifer, though, I can say the original sentence and expect to change the behavior of oil corporations--you do that with strict regulation and monitoring. You can't count on BP (or Exxon, or Texaco, or whothefuckever) to be less of an asshole--you have to force those motherfuckers to be responsible. Left to themselves, they'll cut every possible corner and pinch every penny, and you get what we have today.

And, you know, research and subsidize other energy sources (we subsidize the shit out of the petroleum industry with our road system). I'm not saying that technology will cure all of our ills, but we gotta try.

I'm also sick of reading unless I can say exactly what Obama/gov't should do, then I can not say Obama/gov't needs to do more. That's horseshit

I hear you Jude. I just don't know how you get Congress to have any balls. For every Bernie Sanders who is bringing up real problems and trying to attack root problems you have a dozen schmucks who only want to ride out today's bad headlines and run on ending cleavage in video games or removing salt from food. There isn't a lot of ambitious thinking in our government.

I'm a huge Obama fan but he's much more suited to steering things in the right direction over a long period of time than being commanding in a crisis. Maybe Joe Biden should be given the central role of responding to the BP spill and regulation in general. Calling BP a bunch of fuckers on TV is the first step. It gives permission to the tepid herd of Dems in Congress to actually pass some serious regulation and address the clean up in a coherent way instead of perpetually saying the middle course is best. The middle course sometimes gets you run over by a fucking bus.

Thank you. The number of shitbirds that don't believe that BP should be totally put out of business amazes even a cynic like me.

For every Bernie Sanders who is bringing up real problems and trying to attack root problems you have a dozen schmucks who only want to ride out today's bad headlines and run on ending cleavage in video games or removing salt from food. There isn't a lot of ambitious thinking in our government.

You mean like Louisiana's">http://bit.ly/cP0Out">Louisiana's finest traitor?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Contact Info

  • Adrastos
    adrastos at bellsouth.net
  • Athenae - Allison Hantschel
    athenae25 at yahoo.com
  • Jude
    jude_t at live.com

Athenae's Books

Stats